(TDD Content Warning: Some of the content in the post may be unsuitable for some of our younger TDD readers. Please use appropriate discernment.)
German tennis pro Sarah Gronert is embroiled in controversy, and it has very little to do with her tennis ability. Instead, it is her ambiguous gender which has caused some very heated reaction. Ms. Gronert was born with a very rare condition which resulted in her having both male and female genitalia at birth. Since then she has undergone corrective surgery to remove the male genitalia, so she is now officially certified as a female.
But the questions still persist. There are those who think that her gender ambiguity has given her an unfair advantage in the sport. "There is no girl who can hit serves like that, not even Venus Williams," says Schlomo Tzorefm, the coach of an opponent Gronert recently beat. "This is not a woman, it's a man."
I bring this story to your attention to visit the deeper issue of gender and personhood itself, an issue that comes up regularly here at The Daily Detour. As one writer posed, "What makes a man a man, and what makes a woman a woman?" Indeed, this particular case in the world of sports highlights the central issue in the homosexual/transgender debate. With many people undergoing surgery to change their gender identity, one wonders, "What exactly is the difference between a man and a woman?" (Is it simply related to the presence, or absence, of one's sexual organs? Or, is there more to the answer than that? What happens, for example, if a man is castrated by accident or intention--does he cease to be male?)
Certainly, God designed human beings to have identifiable genders. And different sets of genitalia are an integral part of that design. The complimentary nature of each set of organs testifies to their respective roles in the procreation (and recreation :) of the human species. But are we truly defined by those sex organs? (No more, I would argue, than the true beauty of a person disfigured in an accident or fire is defined by the resulting physical condition of their body.)
Within God's economy, we are so much more than our physical bodies. After all, Scripture is clear that we are made "Imago Dei", that is, in the image of God (Genesis 1:26-27, 9:6). In fact, it is that reality which defines so much of our view of humanity and personhood, and the corresponding dignity that is inherently accorded the human race that other species do not share.
Sometimes, because Scripture refers to God in the masculine sense, we may fail to remember that women are also made in the image of God. While many theologians in history have wrestled with exactly what the "Imago Dei" idea means, we do know that we as the created originate from the Creator. Thus, while both men and women fall on the continuum of defining human characteristics, there are certain strengths which more readily represent one gender or the other. For example, the essence of masculinity--which may include qualities of physical strength, fierce protectionism, and a logical rationality--is complimented by the strengths that make up the essence of women--relational intimacy, emotional connection, nurturing presence, and greater sensitivity. And vice versa. But God defines all of these qualities and more. And He has created us with such qualities. Moreover, we see the perfect representation of those qualities come together in the confines of marriage between men and women. That is how God designed our most intimate relationships to be. And it's only possible if indeed there are distinguishable, necessary differences between men and women.
(I'll leave for a future post an expansion of this idea within the confines of the most intimate of relationships between men and women. But in the meantime, I leave you with this idea to chew on, "Why are women necessary? Put another way, when we think about the creation account in Genesis 1 and 2, what was it, if anything, about the original relationship between God and Adam that was insufficient in itself--to the point that only the creation of a woman would provide the missing ingredients?" Particularly if God is perfect in Himself. Something to think about... :)