(TDD Warning: One of the following links related to this post contains some language and content that may be inappropriate for any of our younger TDD readers. Please use necessary discretion.)
Apparently, today is officially Blasphemy Day, according to the group of secularists who seek to defy God. This effort reminds me of the similar initiative back in May 2007 when atheists were engaging in the "Blasphemy Challenge", videotaping themselves committing the unpardonable sin by blaspheming the Holy Spirit.
I am struck by a couple of things when reflecting on this movement. First of all, as with any of these efforts to blaspheme God, the sheer arrogance demonstrated by those who participate is simultaneously offensive and tragic. But at the same time, it is to be expected. Man's pride versus God's primacy has been the struggle since the beginning of human history. And if there is no God, then we ourselves become our own gods--a prideful position indeed. As long as there is no God, then there are no consequences other than potentially offending those who belief otherwise. But what if all of these mis-guided folks are wrong? Just because the number of people who choose not to believe in God is growing in this country doesn't necessarily mean that He doesn't exist.
Secondly, I find it ironic in this tolerant age that the ridicule of religion is so dismissively tolerated. It's trendy to be a skeptic, and yet, it's offensive to be a Christian. Surprisely, I agree with Paul Kurtz, the emeritus chair of the Center for Inquiry, the organization that sponsored the Blasphemy Day event. He blasted the leadership of the CFI for Blasphemy Day. As he wrote in a blistering essay,
"The right to publish dissenting critiques of religion should be accepted as basic to freedom of expression. But for CFI itself to sponsor the lampooning of Christianity by encouraging anti-Catholic, anti-Protestant, or any other anti-religious cartoons goes beyond the bounds of civilized discourse in pluralistic society.
"One may disagree with contending religious beliefs, but to denigrate them by rude caricatures borders on hate speech. What would humanists and skeptics say if religious believers insulted them in the same way? We would protest the lack of respect for alternative views in a democratic society."
I couldn't agree more. We Christians certainly have contributed our fair share of civil disintegration, and we must humbly accept the times when we have dishonored the name of Christ. But the truth is, it is a human condition, not defined nor limited by religious devotion. And as much as atheists condemn Christians for their role in the disintegration of civil discourse, they too must look in the mirror and consider their own contributions to where we've come as a society on this issue.
Given the gradual devolution happening in our culture, it will not be surprising to see more of these kinds of efforts. The challenge for Christians is to continue to love others, even when it is not reciprocated.